Gary S. Collins, Karel G.M. Moons, Thomas P.A. Debray, Douglas G. Altman, Richard D. Riley
Abstract
Prediction models combine values of multiple predictors to estimate an individual’s risk of having a certain outcome or disease (diagnostic models) or developing a future outcome (prognostic models). Systematic reviews are needed to identify existing prediction models for a certain target population or outcome and to summarize their predictive performance and heterogeneity in their performance. Appraising the quality and reporting of a prediction model study is essential. Studies describing the development or validation of a prediction model often do not conform to prevailing methodological standards and key details are often not reported. Meta-analysis of the predictive performance of a specific prediction model from multiple external validation studies of that model is possible, focusing on calibration and discrimination. In this chapter, we describe the types of systematic reviews that can be conducted on prediction model studies and discuss the challenges faced in identifying, appraising, and qualitatively and quantitatively synthesizing these studies.
Corrections
Page 359 Table 18.3: The entry N, Po, and Pe across different risk strata under “What is reported” should read N, PO and PE across different risk strata.
Resources
There are currently no resources for this chapter.
Practicals
There are no practicals for this chapter.
Author affiliations
Gary S. Collins
Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Karel G.M. Moons
Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care; Cochrane Netherlands, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Thomas P.A. Debray
Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care; Cochrane Netherlands, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Douglas G. Altman
Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Richard D. Riley
Centre for Prognosis Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK
How to cite this chapter?
For the printed version of the book
Collins, G.S., Moons, K.G.M., Debray, T.P.A., Altman, D.G. and Riley, R.D. (2022). Chapter 18. Systematic reviews of prediction models. In: Systematic Reviews in Health Research: Meta-analysis in Context (eds M. Egger, J.P.T. Higgins and G. Davey Smith), pp 347-376. Hoboken, NJ : Wiley.
For the electronic version of the book
Collins, G.S., Moons, K.G.M., Debray, T.P.A., Altman, D.G. and Riley, R.D. (2022). Chapter 18. Systematic reviews of prediction models. In: Systematic Reviews in Health Research: Meta-analysis in Context (eds M. Egger, J.P.T. Higgins and G. Davey Smith). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119099369.ch18